Just out of curiosity, what is a "private park?"
That would be a privately owned park. (Not government owned.)
Are you thinking about stuff like the bumper boats at the Dells, or something like private campgrounds?
I guess those are probably privately owned, but I don't know for certain. Do you suppose that it would be appropriate for a government body to own and operate such "enterprises" as those? Actually I tend to think of Whitnall Park when I think of park(s).
I'm wracking my brains
Main Entry: 3 wrack
Function: transitive verb
: to utterly ruin : wreckBE CAREFUL. Ha ha.
to try to come up with something in the private sector that is comparable in both features and accessibility to something like the Bong reserve, or Kohler-Andrae, which preserves natural terrain, and is open to the public. My observation re: private development of choice natural locations like that is that they are developed [PAID FOR] for the benefit of the few, as either private, high-priced membership resorts, or as private residences.
As opposed to public parks developed (PAID FOR) for- or at least "preserved" for- a very very very few who make use of it, paid for by the many?
Would you be one of those people who enjoy the fact that few can benefit so well at the expense of the many? How much does it cost to "maintain" Bong every year? How many people use it? You might not believe this but, as I know of no Constitutional tenet that precludes (non Federal-) government maintenance/ownership of entities such as Bong, my thought regarding the propriety of such isn't one-hundred percent against. This is why I attempt to work the numbers; how many pay how much for the benefit of how many. Should Bong be maintained for one person? Two? How many? Money directed at Bong isn’t doing other good, you know. So we must determine how best to allocate our dollars.
Maybe, since there is no waste in Detroit government we could invest there? Or at least loan them some money?
You're not one of those envious types who are so jealous of people who can afford private, high-priced membership resorts or private residences, that you would speak ill of them and/or attempt to deprive them of that which they own are you? I know of people who are like that. They think that if they take rich people down a notch that, somehow, other people will benefit. Please tell me you're not one of those. I have no problem with wealth made honorably, even great wealth. How about you?